A trial court uses parts of three experts’ testimony to come up with its own restaurant valuation

Talk about competing messages! A couple owned a 60% interest in a successful Ohio restaurant. During their divorce, the wife’s expert valued the restaurant at $650,893. Amazingly, the husband’s first expert used a “blended” approach (percentage of average cash flow and gross sales) to find the restaurant was worth $691,000—or nearly $40,000 more than the [...]

Read more »